The Central London Humanists in partnership with the British Humanist Association and the South Place Ethical Society (SPES) are staging a debate on the core arguments of the Protest the Pope Campaign.
The motion for the debate will be:
“The Papal Visit should not be a State Visit“.
Speakers for the motion are:
* Professor A. C. Grayling
* Human Rights Campaigner Peter Tatchell
Speakers against the motion are:
* Catholic Journalist Austen Ivereigh
* TBA
Chaired by Polly Toynbee, British Journalist and Writer, columnist for the Guardian since 1998.
The debate will take place at Conway Hall on Wednesday 1st September at 6.30pm.
Free entrance. Seats are limited so early arrival is advised.
More information at http://www.protest-th....
I'm a visitor in London and this was my first GALHA event. I don't know how this meetup actually works. Is it a loose collective of individuals with similar values? Or does the group actually meet up socially after an event like tonight's? I couldn't find any signage or logos that advertised the group.
I was so glad I attended. A C Grayling was brilliant, as expected - witty, cogent and stuck to the subject. Peter Tatchell also spoke well - and perhaps surprised us all by commencing a few positive points that might be made in the Pope's favour (not that many, actually!)
Some memorable moments: a 63-year-old survivor of sexual abuse during her Catholic upbringing spoke up candidly and angrily. This was clearly unexpected and difficult for the RCC apologists to deal with from the platform.
Another glorious moment: a rather pompous man tried to criticise Grayling's impeccable logic (should have known better).
Polly Toynbee chaired the meeting well, dealing with with several people who found it hard to contain their anger. Both sides accused the other of lying - certainly Catholic journalist Austen Ivereigh was guilty of disingenuousness at various points. There was no vote taken, but applause alternated so sides were clearly entrenched.
The debate was quite dynamic I thought! Hard to keep comments focussed and PT could have chaired better I think. Ivereigh and priest were fond of misinformation and factual inaccuracies though they shouldn't have been shouted down? I might have preferred a vote though. People can change their minds after all, even catholics(I had!). Sterling response from Grayling when challenged on his logical thinking! Brilliant.
Was quite an event! While I could sympathize with the Catholic audience for feeling besieged by the critical judgment of their religion, I was singularly unimpressed with the spin from those against the motion. Playing the misunderstood martyr is still their forte it seems.